#REVIEW: 10 Cloverfield Lane

John Goodman’s performance alone is reason enough to see 10 Cloverfield Lane. Iffin’ that’s not enough reason for you, dear reader, here’s Luther M. Siler’s seal of approval.



I do this a lot in movie reviews, which is kind of unfortunate, but it’s still frequently the case: just take my word for it, and go see this movie, and don’t ask any questions and especially don’t read anything about it beforehand.  It’s creepy, well-directed, brilliantly acted (John Goodman deserves Oscar consideration) exciting and well-written; everything a good movie needs to be.

But I haven’t seen Cloverfield!

That’s okay.  Although you should see Cloverfield.  This isn’t a sequel; JJ Abrams called it a “spiritual sister,” or something like that, and while if you’re obsessive about details there are ways to link the two movies together it’s entirely unnecessary to have seen Cloverfield to enjoy 10 Cloverfield Lane.

You should still see both, though.

But I didn’t like Cloverfield!

Ah, shuddup.

There is no shakycam in this movie.  And it’s not found footage.  Does that help?  Good.

Anyway: it…

View original post 83 more words

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s